Fulltext available Open Access
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDietrich, Udo-
dc.contributor.authorKengyel, Nicole-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-03T13:56:06Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-03T13:56:06Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationThe Sustainable City XIen_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-78466-103-8-
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-78466-104-5-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repos.hcu-hamburg.de/handle/hcu/819-
dc.description.abstractAs part of a university course, a group of master students of architecture and urban planning evaluated different public urban spaces. The primary goal of the investigation was to identify which specific qualities create a successful urban space. In other words, which qualities make an urban space fulfil its practical purpose while also becoming enjoyable for communities? The secondary goal was to give students the opportunity to become aware of the importance of urban spaces and their impact on communities. In order to determine the criteria that make an urban space liveable, they analysed positive and negative examples. They started off by taking the 12 Quality Criteria for Good Design of Public Spaces by Jan Gehl as a starting point. After reviewing it, students agreed that the criteria could be improved. They should include crucial aspects such as accessibility and they could also be formulated more precisely. It is important to mention that especially in the case of negative examples, we need to reflect on the actions needed to improve the space; are the proposed changes to make the space better feasible or does the space elude such an improvement? This study will contain a final modified set of Jan Gehl’s criteria, which will include examples of urban spaces that are perceived as positive and negative, their analysis and further proposals for improvement.en
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWIT Press-
dc.subjectdesign of public open spacesen
dc.subjectliveabilityen
dc.subjecthuman scaleen
dc.subjectprotectionen
dc.subjectcomforten
dc.subjectenjoymenten
dc.subject.ddc710: Landschaftsgestaltung, Raumplanung-
dc.titleWhat Makes A Public Open Space Liveable?en
dc.typeconferencePaperen_US
dc.relation.conference11th International Conference on Urban Regeneration and Sustainability (SC 2016), 12-14 July 2016 Alicante, Spainen_US
dc.type.diniConferencePaper-
dc.type.driverconferenceObject-
dc.type.casraiConference Paper-
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
tuhh.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:1373-repos-10434-
tuhh.oai.showtrueen_US
tuhh.publisher.doi10.2495/SC160571-
tuhh.publication.instituteBauphysiken_US
tuhh.type.opusInProceedings (Aufsatz / Paper einer Konferenz etc.)-
tuhh.container.startpage685en_US
tuhh.container.endpage696en_US
tuhh.relation.ispartofseriesnumber204en_US
tuhh.relation.ispartofseriesWIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environmenten_US
tuhh.type.rdmfalse-
openaire.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.creatorOrcidDietrich, Udo-
item.creatorOrcidKengyel, Nicole-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.seriesrefWIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment;204-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.tuhhseriesidWIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.creatorGNDDietrich, Udo-
item.creatorGNDKengyel, Nicole-
item.openairetypeconferencePaper-
crisitem.author.deptBauphysik-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1955-026X-
Appears in CollectionPublikationen (mit Volltext)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
SC16057FU1.pdf1.75 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

636
checked on Dec 24, 2024

Download(s)

343
checked on Dec 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Export

Items in repOS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.