DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDimitrova, Venetsiya-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-07T11:27:16Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-07T11:27:16Z-
dc.date.issued2021-01-28-
dc.identifier.issn2063-0468en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repos.hcu-hamburg.de/handle/hcu/994-
dc.description.abstractMore than any other profession, architecture has been shaped by the tension between autonomy and heteronomy. Recently, however, this dichotomy is seen as unproductive for understanding architects’ practices in-depth, especially in the context of the growing internationalization that is transforming and restructuring architectural practice. The paper applies the lens of ‘relational autonomy’, grasping architectural practice in relation to the actions of other built environment professionals, and to material artefacts. Dependence is framed not as a threat but as a productive potential. The focus of the paper is on the practices of less prominent architects in celebrity global firms. More specifically, the paper explores the practices enacted during the actual materialization of design-ambitious edifices, on-site and in the workshops of sub-contractors. The main argument is that less visible architects can secure and enhance the (relational) autonomy of global architects during construction, by actively shaping a specific working context, where they can purposefully mobilize dependence. Practices during construction generate new opportunities for creative engagement and enhance architects’ influence over processes beyond their autonomous actions, thereby enabling the making of products with high symbolic value.en
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute for Sociology, Centre for Social Sciences (Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence, Eötvös Loránd Research Network)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofSocio.huen_US
dc.subjectglobal architectsen
dc.subjectrelational autonomyen
dc.subjectinternationalizationen
dc.subjectmaterializationen
dc.subjectprofessional practiceen
dc.subject.ddc720: Architekturen_US
dc.titleThe internationalization of architectural practice: Mobilizing dependence to secure and enhance (relational) autonomy on the construction siteen
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.diniarticle-
dc.type.driverarticle-
dc.rights.cchttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.type.casraiJournal Article-
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
tuhh.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:1373-repos-12752-
tuhh.oai.showtrueen_US
tuhh.publisher.doi10.18030/socio.hu.2020en.108-
tuhh.publication.instituteGeschichte und Theorie der Stadten_US
tuhh.type.opus(wissenschaftlicher) Artikel-
tuhh.container.issueSI 8en_US
tuhh.container.startpage108en_US
tuhh.container.endpage117en_US
tuhh.type.rdmfalse-
openaire.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.creatorOrcidDimitrova, Venetsiya-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.creatorGNDDimitrova, Venetsiya-
crisitem.author.deptGeschichte und Theorie der Stadt-
Appears in CollectionPublikationen (mit Volltext)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
document.pdf176.26 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

178
checked on Jun 19, 2024

Download(s)

16
checked on Jun 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Export

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons